In that Forum, you can raise any issue, formulate any comment, ask any question you want, related to the CARBONplus project.

This discussion forum will focus on some key issues with the Adaptation Funds and provide a background for discussing the use of the CARBONplus accounting system as a means to evaluate the adaptation projects within the Funds.
Background Material:
It is recommended that contributors have an understanding of the CARBONplus project and of the adaptation funds measures. An overview of the CARBONplus project can be found in the CARBONplus Overview presentation, with more details on the externalities accounting in the CARBONplus Accounting presentation.
For those who are not aware of the four current adaptation funds we invite you to read through Adaptation Funds document that will provide you a brief background.

We invite you to reflect upon the questions included in the following posts.

Please see below.

Do you think the CARBONplus accounting system can be used in allocating the resources from the above mentioned funds, and with which fund would it be best used?

What could be key factors for creating a CARBONplus standard of accounting?

What potential strengths/weaknesses can you perceive that the CARBONplus accounting system has in such an undertaking?

What key issues do you feel we need to take into consideration for the future success of the CARBONplus project and why?

This discussion forum will focus on discussing CARBONplus accounting tool in
the context of the compliance markets.
Background Material:
It is recommended that contributors have an understanding of the CARBONplus project and of the compliance carbon markets.

An overview of the CARBONplus project can be found in the CARBONplus Overview presentation, with more details on the externalities accounting in the CARBONplus Accounting presentation.
For those who are not aware of the carbon markets, we invite you to go through the Compliance driven Carbon Markets presentation that will provide a brief background.
We invite you to reflect upon the following questions included in the following posts.

Please see below.

One of the flaws with the regulated markets is that they fail to significantly contribute to sustainable development of poor populations in developing countries. Do you think the CARBONplus accounting system can be used for evaluating sustainability issues related to CDM projects?

Taking into account that CARBONplus accounting system is designed to be used on community based micro-scale projects that produce other co-benefits besides GHG mitigation. Do you think CARBONplus accounting tool can help micro-scale projects to achieve higher prices in the market therefore overcoming the prohibitive CDM transaction costs?

This discussion forum will focus on discussing CARBONplus projects in the context of the voluntary markets.

Background Material:

It is recommended that contributors have an understanding of the CARBON plus project and of the voluntary carbon markets. An overview of the CARBONplus project can be found in the CARBONplus Overview presentation, with more details on the externalities accounting in the CARBONplus Accounting presentation.

For those who are not aware of the carbon markets, we invite you to review the Overview of the Voluntary Carbon Markets presentation that will provide a brief background.
We invite you to reflect upon the following questions included in the following posts.

Please see below.

Two of the flaws with the offset market are:1) permanence of forest carbon sink; and 2) additionality of pre-CDM VERs. Can you comment on that? Do you think CARBONplus Accounting system can succeed on adding value to companies offset portfolio by providing offset credits with social and environmental co-benefits?

Taking into account that CARBONplus accounting system is designed to be used on community based micro-scale projects that produce other co-benefits besides GHG mitigation. Do you think CARBONplus can be a good tool for assessing projects social and environmental benefits therefore achieve higher and fair prices for those projects offsetting credits?

How do you think the CARBONplus may help micro-scale community based projects to overcome the high costs associated with monitoring and the third party verification of the voluntary credits?

Micro-scale projects will not produce many carbon offset credits; do you think companies would be willing to mix micro-scale projects within their offset portfolios? Do you think community-based projects can add value to companies’ CSR and marketing strategies?